🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to resume nuclear talks with Washington on condition that it is treated with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's top diplomat has stated.

Abbas Araghchi said only diplomacy worked, and disclosed recent overtures had come from mediators to resume talks with the Trump administration. He said Iran possessed no unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran could not yet allow the global atomic watchdog to access bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Walking a Complex Course

The foreign minister is walking a complex path since Iran wishes not to be perceived to be acting from a stance of disadvantage, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had arisen more resilient in military terms and emotionally from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.

He was talking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium within its borders that it will always maintain" – the key factor of the stalemate in the prior discussions.

Earlier Negotiations Unexpectedly Terminated

The earlier sessions of talks between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and hostile end on 12 June when Israel, with Washington's assistance, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a two-week conflict that ended with the US president claiming the facilities had been destroyed. Subsequently, Western states used their privilege to reinstate UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a significant effect.

Ideal Resolution Suggested

Tehran representatives stated they felt they had attained a "magic solution" to the nuclear fuel concern in prior discussions, when it was agreed an domestic cooperative with US participation could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since local refinement would have remained and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been decided in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could work within Iranian territory, but that was a natural consequence of the partnership suggestion. Diplomats claimed on multiple occasions they had reached agreement with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to collapse due to "detractors in America".

Current Situation

Iranian officials stated the cooperative arrangement was now no longer available, but it seems very probable the proposal could be reintroduced in some form if talks resume.

Trump in recent days said he had been obtaining communications that Iran wanted to resume discussions, but in private Iranian officials say they are not yet obtaining clear proposals from America either explicitly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of non-responsiveness in the wake of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran asserts negotiations is not part of a performance.

Diplomatic Stance

In his speech to the forum, intended to portray the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the notion of worldwide standards, Araghchi stated the fortnight-long engagement showed the dispute could not be settled by combat operations. He stated the attacks started with a US demand for an unconditional Iranian surrender and culminated with an complete request for a truce.

Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with complete American awareness and coordination, making trust challenging to restore.

Dialogue Continues the Final Answer

Araghchi declared: "It was not Iran that had abandoned negotiations; it was America and the western countries that had repeatedly sought to dictate their will during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be viable and remains the final answer to resolve disputes, but its criteria, regulations and fundamentals must be followed."

"Provided that they speak to the Iranian people with the tone of respect and honor, they will receive a response in the equivalent language."

Recovery and Recovery

In what is described by Iran's diplomats as the battle of repair and reconstruction, the foreign minister stated he was assured Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been restored. We learned multiple understandings from this war; we have identified our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the opponent."

He added: "We successfully passed this war. Our nuclear technology, which they aimed to obliterate, remains in place. The installations and equipment, if eliminated, will be restored; what is crucial is the resolve of the Iranian people and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but failed to break. The citizens of Tehran have grown stronger, more cohesive, and more backing of the government and the nation in the wake of this attack."